- From: Joris Huizer <joris_huizer@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 02:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, Kang Jeong-Hee <Keizi@mail.co.kr>, www-html@w3.org
--- Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com> wrote: > > > well, what about iframe as a kind of object, for > implementor? > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/present/frames.html#h-16.5 > > mentions that IFRAME and OBJECT are 'similar'. > > No, this means that the kind of insertion is > similar, not the elements > themselves, correct me if I am wrong. The kind of > use is definitely different, you > use the iframe element for a (in my point of view) > poor and unnecessary > frame integration, and the object element to embed > multimedia, like Flash movies, > images, etc. As a matter of course, you can use the > object element within an > iframe. > I think <object> is just more than <iframe> <object data="index.html" type="text/html"></object> should be equivalent to <iframe src="index.html"></iframe> (unless I forgot some necessary attribute on the object) Correct me if I'm wriong, Joris __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com
Received on Monday, 28 April 2003 05:12:09 UTC