- From: Joris Huizer <joris_huizer@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 00:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>, www-html@w3.org
--- Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com> wrote: > > With the way that the title element is definined in > the working draft, > I would say that XHTML2 does not need the title > element. Anything that > it can do can be just as adequately done by the > title attribute of the > html element. (Note: The html element did not have a > title attribute in > earlier (X)HTML specifications.) Unless the title > element is changed to > have content beyond PCDATA, I see no need to retain > the title element > and have a title attribute on the html element at > the same time. > Simplicity and orthogonality would argue that the > title attribute would > be the preferable choice. > Sorry, but I think that will increase the chaos with the 'title' attribute. It's a mess allready as <link title="green site" type="text/css" href="green.css" /> means something totally different than <a href="green.html" title="view my green site">...</a> Just my opinion :-P Joris __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 03:02:16 UTC