- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:08:20 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> though it is textual. HTML source code, on the other hand, is likely to > contain passages of readable text (hence "text/html"), even if it leaves the > reader wondering what all the symbols mean. > In my view, this is not true of the average commercial web site, where the plain text is too obfuscated by scripting and inline styles to be much more readable than Postscript (unless, as is common, the Postscript has each character individually placed).
Received on Saturday, 12 April 2003 04:08:17 UTC