- From: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:39:41 +0900 (JST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk> wrote: > Further, the RFC that defines the application/xhtml+xml MIME type is of > category "Informational" whereas "text/html" is defined in a "Standards > Track" RFC and so is arguably the most standards-compliant way of > serving up HTML-like content. No. RFC 1866 was a "Standards Track" RFC. It was obsoleted by RFC 2854, which is an "Informational" RFC. Regards, -- Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 23:39:43 UTC