- From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 15:06:37 -0400
- To: www-html <www-html@w3.org>
- CC: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
Etan Wexler wrote: > Ernest Cline wrote to <mailto:www-html@w3.org> on 2003-04-06 21:24 in "" > (<mid:3E90C548.28027.FA7363@localhost>): > > > it does not > > make sense to have use a non-named entity put to such use. > > All entities in XML are named. References of the form 
 are character > references, not entity references. That aside, I don't understand why a > character reference and an entity reference that resolve to the same > character would be of differing utility. An entity reference would provide a name that could serve as a mnemonic aid to remembering what it is for those typing it. While I am convinced using a formatting character was possibly a better solution than markup, a method that forced people who hand-code their documents to use a numeric character reference for such a basic feature as paragraph separation would obviously never get adopted. Any XML or SGML based document type that makes use of any formatting characters in this way would need to use entity references for that reason.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 15:06:21 UTC