- From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:59:09 +0100
- To: Jim Dabell <jim-www-html@jimdabell.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 12:59:19 UTC
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 05:41:39PM +0100, Jim Dabell wrote: | Will there be a new MIME type for XHTML2, or are people expecting to use | application/xhtml+xml? If there is not going to be an XHTML2-specific MIME | type, how are servers supposed to distinguish between user-agents that can | handle XHTML2 and those that cannot (for the purpose of content negotiation | in particular)? The world didn't end when we used the same MIME types for HTML 4 and HTML 3.2! Besides which, most browsers that handle application/xhtml+xml do so by pushing it through a generic XML+CSS/XSLT rendering engine after applying a default style, a technique that should still work with XHTML2. -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39 aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tobyink@a-message.de http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!" playing://(nothing)
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 12:59:19 UTC