- From: Simon Jessey <simon@jessey.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 10:58:43 -0400
- To: "Dave J Woolley" <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
- Cc: "www-html" <www-html@w3.org>
Bah! I knew it was never going to be as simple as that. Thanks for the information. I suppose <email>...</email> (or maybe <mail>...</mail>) is the best option after all. Simon Jessey w: http://jessey.net/blog/ e: simon@jessey.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave J Woolley" <david.woolley@bts.co.uk> Subject: RE: 'email' element type > > Instead of <email>..</email>, how about abbreviating it still further with > > <@>...</@>, since the @ is a component of every email address and is thus > [DJW:] > @ cannot start an XML tag name, or appear anywhere in > one. > > @ is only a component of RFC 822 email addresses, not > email addresses in general. >
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 10:58:47 UTC