- From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 01:31:54 -0700
- To: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>, www-html@w3.org
Ernest Cline wrote to <mailto:www-html@w3.org> on 7 April 2003 in "Re: Adding new character entities (was Re: [XHTML2] Unicode line and paragraph separators)" (<mid:3E915D10.7424.5BE94B@localhost>): > Any idea on when a Universal enity set for XML might surface and who > might need to be prodded/offered help to get work on it further along? I believe that it already exists, thanks to the SPREAD initiative. Although written for SGML, the SPREAD entity declarations should work for XML. The names are not mnemonic: &U2014; is as memorable and attractive as —. The advantage of entities over character references is that redeclarations can adapt for limited environments: <!ENTITY U2014 "---" > <!-- Em dash is not available. --> > (By the way, what do you mean by NCR? I'm assuming numerical entities > such as 
 and 
 but it isn't clear from the page.) If I may be so bold as to speak for another, "NCR" stands for "numerical character reference". Warning: pedantry lies ahead. The constructs 
 and 
 are character references [CR], not entities. The constructs œ and ’ are entity references [ER], not entities. Entities [EN] are the strings of characters that contain markup, character data, or both, intended for inclusion into a document by entity references. [CR] Production 66, "CharRef", in "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition)". W3C Recommendation. 6 October 2000. <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-CharRef>. [ER] Production 68, "EntityRef", in "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition)". W3C Recommendation. 6 October 2000. <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-EntityRef>. [EN] Section 4.3, "Parsed Entities", in "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition)". W3C Recommendation. 6 October 2000. <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#TextEntities>.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 04:34:18 UTC