- From: Simon Jessey <simon@jessey.net>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:18:22 -0400
- To: "www-html" <www-html@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Cline" <ernestcline@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: [XHTML2] Unicode line and paragraph separators > ... the default formatting is why the majority of paragraphs in > current HTML are marked up as paragraphs, even when the content of the > <p> is not really a parargraph. Most things are supposed to be in paragraphs, though. For example, a table of data or an image may actually reside inside a paragraph because they are part of the concept within that paragraph. However, I am sure you will come across dozens of illegitimate uses of <p>...</p> as well. > > One thing occurs to me. If you are suggesting we ignore the structural > > significance of paragraphs and treat them simply as separated chunks of > > text, is that not reducing them to something similar to an unordered list? > > Perhaps paragraphs should be marked up as lists instead. > > > However, please tell me that you were trying to be humorous with that > last remark. In doing my little survey of web pages, I have seen so > much bad coding practice, it is not funny. I have seen <p>'s used to > hold content that should have been lists, list-items, headings and > other semantic elements as well. <td><p>Text</p></td> is also > depressingly common even in cases where the content was not even a > sentence, much less a paragraph. > I was being more ironic than funny. I have seen plenty of cases where the wrong structural elements are employed, many of which can be attributed to crappy WYSIWYG tools. However the concept of using a list to markup paragraphs is not so strange. I am using list items to wrap blog entries that contain one or more paragraphs and taking it one step further into nested lists doesn't seem that big a jump anymore. Simon Jessey w: http://jessey.net/blog/ e: simon@jessey.net
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 07:18:28 UTC