- From: <SCJessey@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:09:34 EDT
- To: www-html@w3.org
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 12:43:49 UTC
Elliotte Rusty Harold says:- <<The line element in XHTML 2.0 is a good thing. It removes one of the last presentational elements in HTML. However, as long as XHTML 2.0 is breaking backwards compatibility by eliminating img, rewriting frames, and more; I see no reason to keep br. I suggest throwing it out completely. That can only simplify the spec and implementations>> I agree with this sentiment entirely. I'm afraid I fail to understand why it is necessary to have any deprecated elements in a specification that is not supposed to be backwards-compatible. In effect, XHTML 2.0 should be treated as a "new" markup language. Simon Jessey e: <A HREF="mailto:scjessey@aol.com">scjessey@aol.com</A> w: <A HREF="http://jessey.net/">http://jessey.net</A>
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 12:43:49 UTC