- From: Gannon J. Dick <gdick@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:21:14 -0600
- To: "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com>, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: "Roland Bluethgen" <calocybe@web.de>, <www-html@w3.org>
Sometimes I can't help but wonder if signature quotes aren't actually inserted on purpose (yours too Terge Bless). I'm sure Mark Twain would be happy to included Congress, People who launch many windows, Spammers etc. ... Perhaps having HTML 4.01 Strict a pop-up free zone would not be a bad thing. MT would have said so, I think. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> To: "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com> Cc: "Roland Bluethgen" <calocybe@web.de>; <www-html@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:43 PM Subject: Re: why not valid? HTML 4.01 strict > > > What does this mean then: > > > > target A, AREA, BASE, FORM, LINK %FrameTarget; #IMPLIED L render in > > this frame > > See that "L" before "render in this frame"? Read the legend on that > page... "L" == "Loose" == "Transitional only" > > Boris > -- > There is no distinctly American criminal class except > Congress. > -- Mark Twain > >
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 14:21:36 UTC