- From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 02:20:26 +0300 (EEST)
- To: Roland Bluethgen <calocybe@web.de>
- cc: <www-html@w3.org>
On 2002-10-16, Roland Bluethgen uttered to www-html@w3.org: >True. But that the 4th article is named '3a' and not '4' is essential >content in this case. I would think not. From the point of view of HTML and ordered lists, it couldn't be less important how the items are called. With a structured representation of a list, naming is arbitrary. It's whatever the reader considers a list, either ordered or unordered. From that point of view, one could just as well name the items by Roman numbers, and that would be it, provided the reader understands the list is ordered. HTML isn't meant to encode presentational elements, a category of meaning list numbering clearly belongs to. It isn't meant to enable one to encode the precise labelling of list items. It's meant to encode the semantics of certain commonly used lists. If we take a list where there is item 3 and item 3a, with the "a" denoting a newer addition to a linear list, the proper encoding would seem to be a list item with a timestamp. However, that sort of thing isn't represented by HTML. It simply isn't. One has to deal with the fact, and not try to go around it. Hence, one has to either use CSS classes, switch to another style language, whatever, to accomplish the fact. I would contend that one has to just leave such constructs out of one's documents to comply with HTML's rules. Whichever the case may be, HTML isn't meant to encode labels, but order or the lack of same. That's sufficient for the representation of most lists in existence. Those lists which cannot be represented should probably be encoded via XHTML extensions, or CSS/XSL acting on suitable class attributes. In any case, native support likely isn't forthcoming, nor should it. -- Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - mailto:decoy@iki.fi, tel:+358-50-5756111 student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front openpgp: 050985C2/025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 19:20:29 UTC