- From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 22:38:55 +0200
- To: www-html <www-html@w3.org>
Curtis C. Hovey: > On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 15:06, Liorean wrote: >> There a thing about the definition lists that I think you should correct, > ... >> the latest heading tag. That behavior would be semantically more correct if >> you instead had a definition container of some sort for each set of dt with >> corresponding dd(s). >> Example: >> <dl> >> <def> >> <dt>java</dt> >> <dd>1. An island</dd> >> <dd>2. A kind of coffee</dd> >> <dd>3. A programming language</dd> >> <def> >> <def> >> <dt>blah</dt> >> <dd>description of blah</dd> >> </def> >> </dl> > This syntax is much clearer that in the draft. I think XHTML 2.0 should > use Liorean's proposal. I agree. Jukka Korpela has made an excellent analysis about definitions and how they can be marked up in HTML: <http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/def.html> What Jukka has to say there should be taken into consideration. -- Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@gmx.net> <http://www.bertilow.com>
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 16:37:48 UTC