www-html@w3.org from December 2002 by date

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• Re: Promotion of XHTML John Lewis
• Re: Promotion of XHTML John Lewis

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Re: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Wingnut
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Ian Hickson
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Tantek Çelik
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Devon Y.
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Richard Norman
• Re[2]: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Alexander Savenkov
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Toby Inkster
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Toby Inkster
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Tantek Çelik
• Re: Promotion of XHTML David Woolley
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Devon Y.
• Re: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Devon Y.
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• Re: Promotion of XHTML John Lewis

Monday, 30 December 2002

• Re: Promotion of XHTML David Woolley
• Re: Promotion of XHTML David Woolley
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Brant Langer Gurganus
• Re[3]: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Alexander Savenkov
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re[2]: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Tim Bagot
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Richard Norman
• Forcing IE to Show Application/xhtml+xml pages Richard Norman
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• FW: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Promotion of XHTML John Lewis
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: Promotion of XHTML John Lewis
• Re[2]: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Alexander Savenkov
• Re[2]: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Alexander Savenkov

Thursday, 26 December 2002

• Re: Promotion of XHTML Jonas Jørgensen

Monday, 30 December 2002

• RE: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• FW: Promotion of XHTML Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Boris Zbarsky
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• RE: Promotion of XHTML Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Promotion of XHTML Brant Langer Gurganus
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Etan Wexler
• RE: Promotion of XHTML or something else Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• Promotion of XHTML Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• RE: Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design

Friday, 27 December 2002

• RE: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Richard Norman
• Re: <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Wingnut
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Jonny Axelsson

Thursday, 26 December 2002

• Re[2]: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Alexander Savenkov
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? John Lewis
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Daniel Glazman
• the volatility, "Lel B. Peto" updating, as today saw 9.25cts.. energypricing@lelpeto.com

Wednesday, 25 December 2002

• Re: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Etan Wexler
• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Etan Wexler
• Re[2]: WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments Alexander Savenkov
• Re[2]: WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments Alexander Savenkov
• <hr /> and WD-xhtml2-20021218 Alexander Savenkov
• RE: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? Denis Boudreau [ CYBERcodeur.net ]
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? James Card

Tuesday, 24 December 2002

• XHTML 2.0 - <line> or <l>? SCJessey@aol.com
• Re: Fixed font size (was: [no subject]) Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: <meta> tags and their practical use David Woolley

Monday, 23 December 2002

• Re: <meta> tags and their practical use Anthony
• Internet Standards Questionnaire Paulsmith410@aol.com
• FW: Chisako Hayakawa
• [www-html] <none> Chisako Hayakawa
• Re: HTML parser ( in c++ ) Daniel Glazman
• Re: Using CSS for XML Events Daniel Glazman

Sunday, 22 December 2002

• Re: Using CSS for XML Events Toby Inkster

Saturday, 21 December 2002

• Re[2]: WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments Alexander Savenkov

Friday, 20 December 2002

• rising on the strength, Lel Bruce Peto updating of very firm cash prices., energypricing@lelpeto.com
• HTML parser ( in c++ ) Sundararajan, Senthil
• Ideas for improved semantics for xhtml 2 WD Devon Y.
• [fwd: Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD] Daniel Glazman

Thursday, 19 December 2002

• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD John Lewis
• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Christoph Päper
• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Tim Bagot
• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Daniel Glazman
• RE: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Richard Norman

Wednesday, 18 December 2002

• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD John Lewis
• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Tim Bagot
• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Boris Zbarsky
• comments on 2002-12-12 XHTML 2.0 WD Daniel Glazman
• Re: Table element's width attribute in the basic table Jun Fujisawa

Tuesday, 17 December 2002

• Re: WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments Christoph Päper
• RE: Table element's width attribute in the basic table BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)
• Re: XHTML 2.0 2002-11-12 Deviations Christoph Päper
• Re: Table element's width attribute in the basic table Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Table element's width attribute in the basic table BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)
• XHTML 2.0 2002-11-12 Deviations Alexander Savenkov
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Richard Norman
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Richard Norman
• Re: Maximum number of fields for an HTML form? Gannon J. Dick
• Maximum number of fields for an HTML form? Rob Brueckmann
• Re: Using CSS for XML Events Daniel Glazman
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Ian Hickson
• second cycle Chicago unleaded is seeing per Lel B Peto updating buyer's.. energypricing@lelpeto.com

Monday, 16 December 2002

• [tobyink@goddamn.co.uk: Re: Using CSS for XML Events] Toby A Inkster
• Re: Using CSS for XML Events Shelby Moore
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Bertilo Wennergren
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Richard Norman
• Re: Using CSS for XML Events Shelby Moore
• Using CSS for XML Events Shelby Moore
• Re: Valid <link rel=""> attributes Ian Davis
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments Christoph Päper

Sunday, 15 December 2002

• Finally you convinced me about HTML and XHTML. Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Saturday, 14 December 2002

• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: How would recursive acronyms be marked up? Toby A Inkster
• Re[2]: WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments Alexander Savenkov
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Ian Hickson
• Re: Valid <link rel=""> attributes fantasai
• How would recursive acronyms be marked up? Brant Langer Gurganus
• Re: Valid <link rel=""> attributes Christoph Päper
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Boris Zbarsky
• RE: Valid <link rel=""> attributes Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Jelks Cabaniss

Friday, 13 December 2002

• Re: WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments Christoph Päper
• Display of AREA? Brad Pettit
• Re: Valid <link rel=""> attributes Wolfgang Köhler
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Ian Hickson
• Re: Valid <link rel=""> attributes Ian Hickson
• Re: WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments Joanne Hunter
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Jelks Cabaniss
• Valid <link rel=""> attributes Wolfgang Köhler
• Re: WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Ian Hickson
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Ian Hickson
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Ian Hickson
• OnLoad problem Vinoj
• WD-xhtml2-20021211 comments John Lewis

Thursday, 12 December 2002

• Re: New drafts: "Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema" Last Call WD, "XHTML 2.0" 2nd WD Joris Huizer
• New drafts: "Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema" Last Call WD, "XHTML 2.0" 2nd WD Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Image Ready, XHTML and Mozilla rendering Boris Zbarsky
• Image Ready, XHTML and Mozilla rendering Laetitia Cassegrain
• Information info@ez-tourism.com
• RE: Sugerencia sobre el HTML y los buscadores Mark Stanton

Wednesday, 11 December 2002

• Sugerencia sobre el HTML y los buscadores Mario Torres

Tuesday, 10 December 2002

• xhtml vs. xlink li zhang cis student
• Re: xhtml browser Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: xhtml browser Vadim Plessky
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: xhtml browser Ian Tindale
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: xhtml browser Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: xhtml browser Vadim Plessky
• Re: xhtml browser Ian Hickson
• Re: xhtml browser Karl Ove Hufthammer
• Re: xhtml browser Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Monday, 9 December 2002

• xhtml browser li zhang cis student
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Ian Hickson
• CDATA and HTML Compatibility was: escaping escaping) David Woolley
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Ian Hickson
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Ian Hickson
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Sunday, 8 December 2002

• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Is this legal XHTML 1.1? Elliotte Rusty Harold

Thursday, 5 December 2002

• Re: Validator New Look Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: HTML Comment Tags and Readers for the Blind Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• Re: escaping escaping David Woolley
• Re: escaping escaping David Woolley
• Re: escaping escaping Jim Correia
• Re: escaping escaping fantasai
• Re: HTML Comment Tags and Readers for the Blind Daniel

Wednesday, 4 December 2002

• HTML Comment Tags and Readers for the Blind J Medcraft
• Re: escaping escaping Terje Bless
• Re: escaping escaping David Woolley
• Re: escaping escaping Gannon J. Dick
• Re: escaping escaping Wingnut
• Re: escaping escaping David Woolley
• Re: escaping escaping Gannon J. Dick
• Re: escaping escaping Ian Hickson
• Re: escaping escaping Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 3 December 2002

• Re: escaping escaping James Card
• Re: escaping escaping Gannon J. Dick
• Re: escaping escaping fantasai
• Re: escaping escaping Gannon J. Dick
• Re: escaping escaping James Card
• Re: escaping escaping fantasai
• RE: escaping escaping Robert Koberg
• RE: escaping escaping Robert Koberg
• Re: escaping escaping Boris Zbarsky
• Re: escaping escaping Daniel
• Re: escaping escaping Philip TAYLOR [PC87S/O-XP]
• escaping escaping Wingnut

Monday, 2 December 2002

• Re: Link type order Ian Hickson

Sunday, 1 December 2002

• Re: Link type order David Woolley
• Re: Link type order Jonny Axelsson
• Link type order John Lewis

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 2002 23:47:06 UTC