- From: Philip TAYLOR [PC335/O-XP] <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:44:28 +0100
- To: Joanne Hunter <jrhunter@menagerie.tf>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
Joanne Hunter wrote: [snip] > This sounds to me like a little creative XSLT, except whether or not the > syntax to such is simple and/or easily understood is kind of debatable. > http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/ Yes, it may well be. However, there are fairly obvious barriers to the widespread adoption of XSLT, which we could attempt to break down. It seems to me that if XSLT is to form the framework (or "infrastructure") of my proposal, then we need to address two issues : 1) What would be the implementation effort required for the next generation of browsers to support XSLT, what processing overheads would XSLT add, and once these are known, what is the probability that the major browser creators would be willing to invest the necessary effort ? and 2) What would be the intellectual investment required for A.Web-Author to learn how to define his or her own tags using XSLT syntax, and once this is known, what percentage of (say) those currently arguing on this list for particular tags/attributes to be added to XHTML would be willing to accept a minimal set of tags and to use XSLT to define their own ? Philip Taylor, RHBNC
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 07:44:35 UTC