- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:55:20 -0700
- To: Brian V Bonini <b-bonini@cox.net>, "Curtis C. Hovey" <chovey@cox.net>, www-html <www-html@w3.org>
Why not <caption> instead of <h>? After all, a list is in many ways a one-dimensional table. In fact some "lists" are even called "tables", e.g. a "Table of Contents" is really a hierarchical list. Tantek (Just posing the question - I do agree with the sentiment that a separate <name> element is probably unnecessary.) On 8/20/02 10:28 AM, "Brian V Bonini" <b-bonini@cox.net> wrote: > > Me three... > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf >> Of Curtis C. Hovey >> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:17 PM >> To: www-html >> Subject: Headings in lists >> >> >> >> I second the motion to use <h> instead of <name> to name a list. >> >> I believe ALL lists (ol, ul, dl, nav) should support it. I've be asked >> to put headings in list for years, and to satisfy my employers I've >> resorted to this: >> >> <ul> >> <b>Highlights</b> >> <li>In exciting beige</li> >> <li>Square case doesn't roll</li> >> <li>Large size is easier to find</li> >> </ul> >> >> Since authors and editor do name their lists, a heading element would >> let me create valid content that my employers will agree to: >> >> <ul> >> <h>Highlights</h> >> <li>In exciting beige</li> >> <li>Square case doesn't roll</li> >> <li>Large size is easier to find</li> >> </ul> >> >> -- >> __C U R T I S C. H O V E Y__________________ >> chovey@cox.net >> No matter where you go...there you are >> >
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 13:46:09 UTC