- From: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:07:40 -0400
- To: <mimasa@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
> From: ext Masayasu Ishikawa [mailto:mimasa@w3.org] > It comes down to whether > > - we should keep silent to make Process happy, or > - we should keep public informed > > and we consider the latter has greater value. It's easier for us > to go for the former, or we could work-around the process question > by not publishing this document as a TR (e.g. post this docuemnt to > this mailing list and pretend that it's not a new WD), but I don't > think those are better ways. This implies the Process document did not work for the HTML WG (and apparently did not work for the XML Schema WG) and should be fixed - rather than have individual WGs implement work-arounds for a broken process. > If you consider our practice is against the spirit of the W3C Process, > you may raise the issue to the Advisory Committee. Will do. Thanks, Art Barstow ---
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 08:07:44 UTC