- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:21:07 -0400 (EDT)
- To: mimasa@w3.org (Masayasu Ishikawa)
- Cc: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com, xml-dev@lists.xml.org, shane@aptest.com, tbray@textuality.com, www-html@w3.org, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Masayasu Ishikawa scripsit:
> No. We are waiting XPointer to advance to more mature stage, and
> relevant media type registrations get updated.
Adopting XLink and XPointer involves providing a conformance clause
for the use of XPointer: which of the four XPointer documents do you
make mandatory. It's possible to shuffle this off onto XMLMIME,
but then you limit XHTML to whatever is appropriate for general XML.
IMHO XHTML 2.0 should define its own level of XPointer conformance.
--
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com http://www.reutershealth.com
"Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do all you will have to do
will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done."
"Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking
you to do anything you can put the telegram down as a forgery."
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 15:24:17 UTC