- From: Peter Sheerin <pete@petesguide.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:44:45 -0700
- To: "Masayasu Ishikawa" <mimasa@w3.org>, <koch@pixelpark.com>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
> Actually this is under (re)consideration. It was a URI in HTML 4 and > XHTML 1.0, but was changed to IDREF in Modularaization of XHTML (and > hence in XHTML 1.1) as > implementation experience has showed that > support for external map reference is very weak This should not be relevant for a spec that is not intended to be backwards compatible. For image maps that are used on multiple pages, a URI reference is the most logical way to accomplish this. Why force authors to use server-side includes when setting this type as a URI would work? > and has a lot of difficulties in implementing it. Such as what? I could forsee some overhead in loading subsequent pages if the map were not cached, but that strikes me as easily solved.
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2002 19:18:00 UTC