- From: Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 12:39:22 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
Hi On Thu 08-Aug-2002 at 12:36:22 +0100, Nicholas Atkinson wrote: > > So, <shameless_plug> in my company's forthcoming validating > XHTML/DocBook/WML/XML editor </shameless_plug>, we will be bundling an > "enhanced" version of the XHTML 1.0 DTD with it that supports the > <embed> element and a few other attributes such as > marginwidth/marginheight on the body element (if we can make it an > XHTML 1.1 module, we will do it that way, only I think that may not be > possible). I would prefer if this was not necessary, but it seems > it is. If anyone can suggest any other attributes or elements that > are also necessary in the "real world", please contact me, as we would > like to include them. The only one that I find myself forced to use is the wrap="virtual" attribute on textareas. Personally I agree that it would be good if these things were in the XHTML 1.0 transitional DTD. There is no point in making them a XHTML 1.1 module since XHTML 1.1 shouldn't be served as text/html and the browsers that these things target only support text/html. Chris -- Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk> web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/ web content management http://mkdoc.com/ everything else http://chris.croome.net/
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2002 07:39:25 UTC