www-html@w3.org from August 2002 by date

Saturday, 31 August 2002

• iframe René Fournier

Thursday, 29 August 2002

• RE: Implementation of "accesskey" support in Mozilla and IE latest? James Craig
• Implementation of "accesskey" support in Mozilla and IE latest? Karr, David
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Joanne Hunter

Wednesday, 28 August 2002

• Re: DISCONTINUE : In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Chris Croome

Tuesday, 27 August 2002

• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Toby Inkster
• In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) SCJessey@aol.com
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) fantasai
• HTML Semantics extractor Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
• Re: DISCONTINUE : In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Philip TAYLOR [PC335/O-XP]
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags David Woolley
• RE: XHTML DTD Issues Michael Hallett
• Re: Another angle to the HR argument SCJessey@aol.com
• Another angle to the HR argument M Chamlee

Monday, 26 August 2002

• Re: DISCONTINUE : In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) SCJessey@aol.com
• DISCONTINUE : In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) eximcon
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) David Majda

Sunday, 25 August 2002

• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Joanne Hunter
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Gabriele Fava
• Re: Section Separator (was In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>)) Alexander Savenkov
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Joris Huizer
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Tim Bagot
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Jan Roland Eriksson

Saturday, 24 August 2002

• Re: 'nl': presentational or semantic? Gabriele Fava
• Re: HTML Working Group Rechartered Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Tim Bagot
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Toby Inkster
• 'type' for style spec (Was: The 'type' attribute) William F Hammond
• HTML WG rechartered SCJessey@aol.com
• Re: <meta> tags and their practical use Lachlan Cannon
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Lachlan Cannon
• RE: Headings in lists Tim Bagot
• DISCONTINUE 'nl': presentational or semantic? eximcon
• DISCONTINUE <meta> tags and their practical use eximcon
• The 'type' attribute Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: Headings in lists Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: How about a <notice>element? Jelks Cabaniss
• Section Separator (was In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>)) Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: [WD XHTML 2.0 ] why not use xlink Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: [WD XHTML 2.0 ] why not use xlink Jelks Cabaniss
• HTML Working Group Rechartered Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: <meta> tags and their practical use Tom Gilder

Friday, 23 August 2002

• Re: <meta> tags and their practical use Toby Inkster
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Joanne Hunter
• Re: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Etan Wexler
• 'nl': presentational or semantic? Etan Wexler
• Re: CSS2.1: \A and white-space Etan Wexler
• Re: Comments about the 2002-08-05 XHTML 2.0 WD Etan Wexler
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Etan Wexler
• Re: The X in HTML Etan Wexler
• Re: How about a <notice>element? Etan Wexler
• Re: How about a <notice>element? Etan Wexler
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Etan Wexler
• <meta> tags and their practical use Kai Lahmann

Thursday, 22 August 2002

• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Gabriele Fava

Friday, 23 August 2002

• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Gabriele Fava
• Re: [WD XHTML 2.0 ] why not use xlink Karl Ove Hufthammer
• Re: Comments about the 2002-08-05 XHTML 2.0 WD Tom Gilder
• Re: [WD XHTML 2.0 ] why not use xlink Bill Daly
• Re: Comments about the 2002-08-05 XHTML 2.0 WD Arguile

Thursday, 22 August 2002

• Re: Comments about the 2002-08-05 XHTML 2.0 WD Gabriele Fava
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: Comments about the 2002-08-05 XHTML 2.0 WD Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: [WD XHTML 2.0 ] why not use xlink Nicolás Lichtmaier
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) fantasai
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) David Woolley
• Re: Proposal of an element for numbers David Woolley
• Proposal of an element for numbers Christoph Päper
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) fantasai
• Re: How about a <notice>element? fantasai
• Re: The X in HTML Philip TAYLOR [PC335/O-XP]
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Chris Croome
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags David Woolley
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: New html security tag David Woolley
• Re: Comments about the 2002-08-05 XHTML 2.0 WD Chris Mannall
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Chris Mannall
• RE: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Tim Bagot
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Joanne Hunter
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Joanne Hunter
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Joanne Hunter
• Re: Moving from DTDs to Schemas Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Mark Gallagher
• Re: The X in HTML Joanne Hunter
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags M Chamlee
• 'Table of Contents/Sections' Wording Wesley Moy
• Re: New html security tag Nicolás Lichtmaier
• Suggestion for XHTML2 lists Nicolás Lichtmaier

Wednesday, 21 August 2002

• RE: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Micah Dubinko
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Sampo Syreeni
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: The "request for an element" nonsense... Henri Sivonen
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Toby Inkster
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: a new value for <title> and other meta tags Chris Croome
• [OT?] questions/ideas about XHTML, CSS and XML Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: Comments about the 2002-08-05 XHTML 2.0 WD Gabriele Fava
• Re: The "request for an element" nonsense... Philip TAYLOR [PC335/O-XP]
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Bill Daly
• a new value for <title> and other meta tags Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Toby Inkster
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Toby Inkster
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Toby Inkster
• Re: The "request for an element" nonsense... Henri Sivonen
• please disregard: xhtml-friendly Julie Dion
• xhtml-friendly Julie Dion
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Lorenzo De Tomasi
• RE: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Brian V Bonini
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Bill Daly
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Christian Ottosson
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Lorenzo De Tomasi
• In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) SCJessey@aol.com
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: xhtml validation Christoph Schneegans
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Chris Mannall
• Re: Ampersand not permitted in AttValue Gabriele Fava
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Chris Mannall
• Re: Comments about the 2002-08-05 XHTML 2.0 WD Chris Mannall
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Alexander Savenkov
• Re: In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: xhtml validation Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• In support of the "line space" (nee <hr>) Micah Dubinko

Tuesday, 20 August 2002

• Re: How about a <notice> element? Sampo Syreeni
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Sampo Syreeni
• Re: xhtml validation Christoph Schneegans
• Re: Headings in lists [and tables] Curtis C. Hovey
• RE: How about a <notice> element? Brian V Bonini
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: Headings in lists Christoph Päper
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Toby Inkster
• Re: Headings in lists Tantek Çelik
• Re: Headings in lists Christoph Päper
• Re: Headings in lists Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: xhtml validation Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Headings in lists Tantek Çelik
• RE: Headings in lists Curtis C. Hovey
• RE: Headings in lists Brian V Bonini
• Headings in lists Curtis C. Hovey
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Curtis C. Hovey
• RE: How about a <notice> element? Brian V Bonini
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Jonas Jørgensen

Thursday, 20 June 2002

• Re: How about a <notice> element? Jonas Jørgensen

Tuesday, 20 August 2002

• xhtml validation Brian V Bonini
• extracting links with libwww Matthew Love

Monday, 19 August 2002

• Comments about the 2002-08-05 XHTML 2.0 WD Henri Sivonen

Sunday, 18 August 2002

• XHTML and <h> Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: Ampersand not permitted in AttValue Sampo Syreeni
• Re: Moving from DTDs to Schemas Lachlan Cannon

Saturday, 17 August 2002

• Re: Ampersand not permitted in AttValue Gabriele Fava
• RE: Ampersand not permitted in AttValue Brian V Bonini
• Re: Moving from DTDs to Schemas Masayasu Ishikawa
• Validation (was Re: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML?) Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Ampersand not permitted in AttValue Gabriele Fava
• RE: xhtml-m12n-schema XSDs broken? (ruby & others) Austin, Daniel
• Re: Ampersand not permitted in AttValue kelvSYC

Friday, 16 August 2002

• Re: How about a <notice> element? Jonas Jørgensen
• Ampersand not permitted in AttValue Gabriele Fava
• Moving from DTDs to Schemas William F Hammond
• Re: New html security tag Andrew McFarland
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? William F Hammond
• Re: New html security tag sven.latham@doihavetime.com
• New html security tag Carlos Paz
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Masayasu Ishikawa

Thursday, 15 August 2002

• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Recently published documents Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Masayasu Ishikawa
• RE: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Masayasu Ishikawa

Wednesday, 14 August 2002

• Re: The X in HTML Shane McCarron
• RE: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• RE: XML Events maturity level Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• RE: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Manos Batsis
• XHTML2, RDF, Xlink and namespace URLs [Was: Re: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML?] Chris Croome
• RE: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Manos Batsis
• Re: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Lachlan Cannon
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Lachlan Cannon
• Re: XML Events maturity level Masayasu Ishikawa
• RE: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Stefan Ram

Tuesday, 13 August 2002

• How about URIs (was: RE: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML?) Manos Batsis
• RE: XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Manos Batsis
• XHTML 2.0 - no interest in RDF/XML? Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• XML Events maturity level Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• Re: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Jens Müller
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: The X in HTML Philip TAYLOR [PC87S/O-XP]
• Re: The X in HTML Philip TAYLOR [PC87S/O-XP]
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Lachlan Cannon
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Masayasu Ishikawa
• RE: How about a <notice>element? Sampo Syreeni
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Lachlan Cannon
• Re: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Lachlan Cannon
• Re: The X in HTML Lachlan Cannon
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Lachlan Cannon
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Masayasu Ishikawa
• RE: How about a <notice>element? Charles W. Johnson
• RE: The X in HTML Manos Batsis
• Re: RE: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Samuli Lintula
• RE: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) James Craig
• RE: How about a <notice>element? Mark Stanton
• Re: Recently published documents Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: How about a <notice>element? kelvSYC
• Re: How about a <notice>element? Christoph Päper
• Re: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Michael Day
• RE: How about a <notice>element? Mark Stanton

Monday, 12 August 2002

• The "request for an element" nonsense... kelvSYC
• RE: How about a <notice>element? Charles W. Johnson
• Re: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Samuli Lintula
• Re: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Jonny Axelsson
• Re: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Toby Inkster
• Re: XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Philip TAYLOR [PC335/O-XP]
• XHTML2: Elements to include and not to include (i and b) Samuli Lintula
• Re: The X in HTML William F. Hammond
• Re: The X in HTML Johannes Koch
• Re: The X in HTML Philip TAYLOR [PC335/O-XP]
• Re: The X in HTML Jonny Axelsson
• The X in HTML Philip TAYLOR [PC87S/O-XP]
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 SCJessey@aol.com
• RE: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Manos Batsis
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 SCJessey@aol.com
• RE: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Manos Batsis
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Chris Croome
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 SCJessey@aol.com
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Lachlan Cannon
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Toby Inkster
• RE: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Manos Batsis
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Chris Mannall
• Re: How about a <notice>element? Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Mark Gallagher
• Re: How about a <notice>element? James Card
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and Xlinks (again)) Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/#s_frames-element Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: What kelvSYC thinks of XHTML 2.0 Mark Gallagher
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Mark Gallagher
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Jonas Jørgensen

Saturday, 10 August 2002

• xframes: security/abuse Michael Facius

Monday, 12 August 2002

• Re: http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/#s_frames-element Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: How about a <notice> element? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: What kelvSYC thinks of XHTML 2.0 Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and Xlinks (again)) Joanne Hunter
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Bjoern Hoehrmann
• What kelvSYC thinks of XHTML 2.0 kelvSYC
• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Jonas Jørgensen
• How about a <notice> element? Jonas Jørgensen

Sunday, 11 August 2002

• Re: My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Toby Inkster
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft William F Hammond
• Re: Verbosity of XHTML 2 (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and Xlinks (again)) Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• My comments on the XHTML 2 draft. Toby Inkster
• Please report errors to www-html-editor@w3.org Masayasu Ishikawa
• Verbosity of XHTML 2 (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and Xlinks (again)) Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Error in xhtml2-20020805/W3C-WD.css Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/#s_frames-element Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and Xlinks (again) Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Chris Croome
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and Xlinks (again even more) Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and Xlinks (again) Michael Day
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jan Roland Eriksson
• XHTML 2.0 and Xlinks (again) Lachlan Cannon
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Lachlan Cannon

Saturday, 10 August 2002

• Re: Why the STYLE element (and attrib) shall not be in XHTML2 (Was:Re: Why is the style tag restricted to the head?) Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: XHTML 2.0 tables: time to move on Rick [Kitty5]
• DISCONTINUE XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? eximcon
• DISCONTINUE [xml-dev] Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? eximcon
• DISCONTINUE [WD XHTML 2.0] usemap attribute eximcon
• Specific method of captioning images/objects is needed Peter Sheerin
• Re: [WD XHTML 2.0] usemap attribute Peter Sheerin

Friday, 9 August 2002

• Re: Why the STYLE element (and attrib) shall not be in XHTML2 (Was:Re: Why is the style tag restricted to the head?) Bert Bos
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? John Cowan
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: [WD XHTML 2.0] usemap attribute Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Justin_Bell@stats.govt.nz
• Re: Why the STYLE element (and attrib) shall not be in XHTML2 (Was:Re: Why is the style tag restricted to the head?) Tantek Çelik
• Re: Recently published documents Masayasu Ishikawa
• Why the STYLE element (and attrib) shall not be in XHTML2 (Was:Re: Why is the style tag restricted to the head?) Jan Roland Eriksson
• XHTML 2.0 tables: time to move on Manos Batsis
• XHTML2.0 expanding blockquote with bibliography Lorenzo De Tomasi
• XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? AndrewWatt2000@aol.com

Thursday, 8 August 2002

• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Joanne Hunter
• Re: [WD XHTML 2.0] usemap attribute Peter Sheerin
• Re: XHTML2.0 href and visible URLs Tom Gilder
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft William F Hammond
• XHTML2.0 href and visible URLs Lorenzo De Tomasi
• freind CHRIS@w3.org
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft SCJessey@aol.com

Wednesday, 7 August 2002

• XFRAMES: Why "source" instead of "src"? chipple@chipple.net

Tuesday, 6 August 2002

• 'implementation' by JavaScript Ruud Steltenpool

Thursday, 8 August 2002

• DISCONTINUE Fw: Recently published documents eximcon
• Re: Element Collections and Other Comments on WD-xhtml2-20020805 Paul Arzul
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the href and src attributes Jonny Axelsson
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the href and src attributes Jonas Jørgensen
• Element Collections and Other Comments on WD-xhtml2-20020805 Alexander Savenkov
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the href and src attributes Chris Mannall
• Re: XHTML2.0 and the noscript element. Jonny Axelsson
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the href and src attributes Jonny Axelsson
• XHTML2.0 and the noscript element. Chris Mannall
• XHTML 2.0 and the href and src attributes Chris Mannall
• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Chris Croome
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Paul Arzul
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Joanne Hunter
• XFRAMES: Why "source" instead of "src"? Patrick Benny

Wednesday, 7 August 2002

• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Nicholas Atkinson
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft William F Hammond
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Michael Bowen
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jens Müller
• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Joanne Hunter
• Re[2]: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Alexander Savenkov
• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Nicholas Atkinson
• functionality of <column> and <row> Ma, Guozhong
• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Johannes Koch
• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Philip TAYLOR [PC87/O-2K]
• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Johannes Koch
• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Nicholas Atkinson
• Re: Comments on "section", "LinkTypes" and "quote" in XHTML 2.0 WD Chris Croome
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft William F Hammond
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonny Axelsson
• Re: [WD XHTML 2.0 ] why not use xlink Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: [WD XHTML 2.0] usemap attribute Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonny Axelsson
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Ineke van der Maat
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Client side image maps dependent on the Image module? Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Mark Gallagher
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Mark Gallagher
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonny Axelsson
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonny Axelsson
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Andrew Clover
• XHTML 2.0: Client side image maps dependent on the Image module? Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonas Jørgensen
• Fw: [WD XHTML 2.0 ] why not use xlink Ineke van der Maat
• [WD XHTML 2.0] usemap attribute Johannes Koch
• [WD XHTML 2.0 ] why not use xlink Johannes Koch
• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Johannes Koch
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonny Axelsson
• BUY Glass Toys, animals, etc eximcon
• Re: Error in xhtml2-20020805/W3C-WD.css Masayasu Ishikawa
• Error in xhtml2-20020805/W3C-WD.css Simon Hill
• RE: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jelks Cabaniss
• MathMl symbol problem G. Andrew Page

Tuesday, 6 August 2002

• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Nicholas Atkinson
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Alexander Savenkov
• The br element in XHTML 2.0 Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Jonny Axelsson
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Philip TAYLOR [PC87/O-2K]
• Re: Recently published documents Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Chris Mannall
• Re: Fw: Recently published documents Jonny Axelsson
• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Philip TAYLOR [PC87S/O-XP]
• Comments on XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Chris Mannall
• Re: img module removed in XHTML 2.0? Christian Ottosson
• img module removed in XHTML 2.0? Ineke van der Maat
• Fw: Recently published documents Nicholas Atkinson
• Comments on "section", "LinkTypes" and "quote" in XHTML 2.0 WD Christian Ottosson
• Recently published documents Masayasu Ishikawa

Monday, 5 August 2002

• BUY Glass Vials, Ampoules, Test Tubes eximcon

Sunday, 4 August 2002

• Re: XHTML extension Roland Bluethgen
• XHTML extension Albert Oliver Serra

Saturday, 3 August 2002

• [www-html] <none> H@w3.org
• BUY Spectrum Analysis Tubes, Crooke's Radiometers eximcon

Friday, 2 August 2002

• Re: Scrollbars in Table Cells? Sarah Jane Dobson
• Re: Scrollbars in Table Cells? David Dorward
• Re: Scrollbars in Table Cells? Masayasu Ishikawa
• Scrollbars in Table Cells? SeaHen
• Re: Contribution to the W3C HTML test suite Paul Arzul

Thursday, 1 August 2002

• Re: Contribution to the W3C HTML test suite Tantek Çelik
• Re: Contribution to the W3C HTML test suite Philip TAYLOR [PC87/O-2K]

Last message date: Friday, 30 August 2002 21:03:58 UTC