- From: Christian Wolfgang Hujer <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:03:30 +0200
- To: "Masayasu Ishikawa" <mimasa@w3.org>, <www-html@w3.org>
Hello,
> -----Original Message-----
> "Christian Wolfgang Hujer" <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com> wrote:
>
> > - requirement of the alt attribute for the <img/>-element is
> not new. For
> > HTML 4.01, HTML 4, HTML 3.2, HTML 3.0 and HTML 2.0 I am sure they also
> > required the alt attribute for valid documents.
>
> Just for the record, the alt attribute on the img element was NOT
> required in HTML 3.2, (never-standardized) HTML 3.0 and HTML 2.0.
> Same for HTML i18n (RFC 2070). It was changed in HTML 4.0.
yeah, sorry, I was wrong about that.
HTML 3.2:
<!ATTLIST IMG
src %URL #REQUIRED -- URL of image to embed --
alt CDATA #IMPLIED -- for display in place of image --
[...]
>
Sorry.
[cut]
> Regards,
> --
> Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org
> W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Thank you for your corrections about that.
Greetings
Christian
Received on Friday, 7 September 2001 09:09:33 UTC