- From: Clover Andrew <aclover@1value.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 13:00:45 +0200
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Considering this, and considering the well-recognised problems > setting HTTP headers on many Web servers, is it reasonable for > an HTML implementation to prefer the media type indicated by > 'type' over that returned with the resource, for purposes of > dispatch? I very much hope no implementations do this! There are already enough problems caused by IE ignoring the Content-Type when it detects a different filetype through sniffing; I would hate to see the interpretation of an object depend on how it was referred to as well. My interpretation was that it could perhaps be used to avoid opening a new browser window if the UA sees that the likely returned Content-Type of a link would require a file download instead, or to avoid needlessly fetching a stylesheet or script written in a language the UA would be incapable of dealing with. But my interpretation may well be a load of rubbish of course. -- Andrew Clover Technical Consultant 1VALUE.com AG
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 07:04:44 UTC