- From: <roconnor@Math.Berkeley.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 11:56:04 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-html <www-html@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Chris Haynes wrote:
> Since it appears that no one seems close to specifying a workable
> version-indication standard, my options seem to be:
>
> 1) Stick to generating HTML4.01 for the next 5 years or so until all
> my target market has migrated to generation 6+,
I'd suggest this option. You can't be in the ``leading edge'' of
standard, and still appeal to a wide target audience. Since it is likely
that a wide target audience is what you really want, I'd suggest sticking
to HTML 4.01, or HTML 3.2.
- --
Russell O'Connor roconnor@math.berkeley.edu
<http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~roconnor/>
``This is not a time, as it is never a time, to seek vengeance, but a
time to seek the courage to forgive'' -- George W. Bush
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7/VhZZG3em5NXM14RAlcsAKD6AZ7raR4j1ydiO/5jowysZtIDwACgqYHC
4h12ck9PfRcZgxK4+l638CA=
=zFV3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 14:56:11 UTC