- From: Scott E. Lee <sandman_001@netzero.net>
- Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 04:30:12 -0600
- To: www-html@w3.org
Chris Wilson wrote: > Claiming that support of non-standard (i.e., proprietary) object model makes > an implementation "non-standards-compliant" is incorrect. It is proprietary > OM, but nothing the DOM claims exclusion of any other OM. > > -Chris Wilson > Program Manager > Internet Explorer team But implementing non-standard object models that allow for sloppy cut-around methods of standards-compliant objects is a way of undermining the DOM. Yes? That is what gets my cheese. Just a thought in the middle of the night. --Scott E. Lee --Unemployed Bum --O'Fallon, Missouri --USA --HTML4.01/XHTML/XML compliant Shop online without a credit card http://www.rocketcash.com RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2001 05:30:16 UTC