- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 00:22:32 -0000
- To: "John Hardy" <jh@lagado.com>, <www-talk@w3.org>, <www-html@w3.org>
> a page rendered as into graphics format is already too low level > (it has lost too much semantic information) to be a useful interchange > format. I agree, and I think it's mainly a question of the structuring of the two formats. SVG wasn't built to be a WWW format of it's own right, whereas HTML was designed (however incorrectly*) to be the lingua franca of the Web. *Things are turning around:- "XHTML 2.0 is a next generation markup language. In this version, the functionality is expected to remain similar to (or a superset of) that of XHTML 1.1. However, the markup language may be altered semantically and syntacticly to conform to the requirements of related XML standards such as XML Linking and XML Schema. The objective of these changes is to ensure that XHTML 2.0 can be readily supported by XML browsers that have no arcane knowledge of HTML semantics such as linking, image maps, forms, etc. The development of XHTML 2.0 will likely require the development of new XHTML modules or revisions to existing XHTML modules." - http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/xhtml-roadmap/#xhtml20 The tide is turning...slowly! -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://infomesh.net/2001/01/n3terms/#> . [ :name "Sean B. Palmer" ] has :homepage <http://infomesh.net/sbp/> .
Received on Sunday, 21 January 2001 19:24:15 UTC