- From: Charles F. Munat <chas@munat.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 13:26:25 -0800
- To: "'Sean B. Palmer'" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-talk@w3.org>, <www-html@w3.org>
I don't think I'd go so far as to say that text is more important than graphics. That presumes a far more literate world than we currently have. What about people who are illiterate? What about people with cognitive/learning disabilities? What about people for whom the language of the page is a second or third language? Images speak loudly. A picture of one dead child can do more to convey the horror of war than thousands of words. I commend your aggressive promotion of accessibility, Sean, but let's not forget that there are many for whom images are the key to accessibility. That said, I think that Andrew is a man on a mission, and like all true believers, his faith is unshakeable. He wants to build (is building) all SVG web sites. And while I'm not convinced that an all-SVG site is inherently a bad thing, I hope that you are right and that XHTML remains the lingua franca. I also hope that Andrew broadens his view. A Leatherman is a nice tool for quick fixes or minor problems, but it cannot compare to a complete set of tools. Actually, that's a pretty good analogy. For many people, a Leatherman is all they need. And I don't see a problem with SVG used for millions of home pages or simple sites. But that's only one type of site. For a large, database-backed, text-intensive site, the full tool set should be required. Charles F. Munat, Seattle, Washington -----Original Message----- From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Sean B. Palmer Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 12:56 PM To: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com; www-talk@w3.org; www-html@w3.org Subject: Re: Lingua Franca of the Web - Will SVG replace HTML? (from the subject): Will SVG replace HTML? Replace - no chance. Complement - yes please. SVG is great as far as accessibility for graphics goes, but I think it would be a huge mistake to claim that it can do things outside of its scope when it simply can't. I'm a big fan of SVG over using pixellated image formats, and I hope that SVG seriously becomes the most widely used Web graphics format, but no way will it replace HTML. It will be used inside XHTML, and can perform numerous functions, but it simply doesn't have the document structuring or modularization that XHTML provides. XHTML has been the lingua franca for the Web for 10 years, and I don't think it will be replaced by anything soon, even a "better" version of XHTML itself. While it my evolve to some extent, it will not resemble a graphics format, and nor should it to. Text it the most important thing in the world, followed by graphics: some people can't see graphics. Content, and expression of that content in interopeable ways is vital to the existence of the Web, and XHTML does provide that in some senses (even though many (including myself in this thread) have pointed out it isn't perfect). -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://infomesh.net/2001/01/n3terms/#> . [ :name "Sean B. Palmer" ] has :homepage <http://infomesh.net/sbp/> .
Received on Sunday, 21 January 2001 16:19:33 UTC