- From: NeTDeMoN <NeTDeMoNZ@flashmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:39:30 -0500
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Mozilla and Netscape 6.01 almost fully follows DOM 2 /1, CSS 2 / 1, and HTML 4.01 transitional and strict among other doctypes. There are only a few examples that I can think of where this is not the case, and we are working on implementing those. As far as html tags, if its in the standard, then Mozilla supports it. -----Original Message----- From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dunbar, Jennifer L Ms MAMC Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:54 To: 'Chris Wilson'; 'www-html@w3.org' Subject: RE: Make Microsoft follow the spec. As a student to the world of website building, I am wondering about a fundamental question. The w3c is an agreed upon entitiy that maintains/monitors/develops the language of the web (html,xml, etc). If this is the case, why is it that all "up to date" browser programs do not support all included "tags" for this language? Maybe I am over simplifying this problem? -----Original Message----- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:cwilso@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 6:36 PM To: 'www-html@w3.org' Subject: RE: Make Microsoft follow the spec. Unless you work for Microsoft, please don't make presumptions about what we did or didn't do "deliberately". Bugs in our CSS implementation that cause us to fail forward compatibility tests were not intentional. -Chris Wilson Jan Roland Eriksson [mailto:jrexon@newsguy.com] wrote: >What I do know is that MS has deliberately shot a big hole in the bottom >of the CSS "FCR" [Forward Compatibility Rules]...
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2001 17:35:39 UTC