- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:07:45 -0800
- To: "'Dunbar, Jennifer L Ms MAMC'" <Jennifer.Dunbar@nw.amedd.army.mil>, "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
Because the W3C does not define our product lines for us. Just because our browser is "up to date" doesn't mean what the collection of all our customers tell us to do is the same as the latest set of Recommendations from the W3C. -----Original Message----- From: Dunbar, Jennifer L Ms MAMC [mailto:Jennifer.Dunbar@nw.amedd.army.mil] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 8:54 AM To: Chris Wilson; 'www-html@w3.org' Subject: RE: Make Microsoft follow the spec. As a student to the world of website building, I am wondering about a fundamental question. The w3c is an agreed upon entitiy that maintains/monitors/develops the language of the web (html,xml, etc). If this is the case, why is it that all "up to date" browser programs do not support all included "tags" for this language? Maybe I am over simplifying this problem? -----Original Message----- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:cwilso@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 6:36 PM To: 'www-html@w3.org' Subject: RE: Make Microsoft follow the spec. Unless you work for Microsoft, please don't make presumptions about what we did or didn't do "deliberately". Bugs in our CSS implementation that cause us to fail forward compatibility tests were not intentional. -Chris Wilson Jan Roland Eriksson [mailto:jrexon@newsguy.com] wrote: >What I do know is that MS has deliberately shot a big hole in the bottom >of the CSS "FCR" [Forward Compatibility Rules]...
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2001 12:09:23 UTC