Re: client side includes

Hi,

> > To do so at the expense of your user's experience is a very poor
> > and selfish design philosophy.
> 
> I think you overstate your case.  Hitting the server for another
> chunk of data is not that expensive.  It happens all the time for
> images, CSS files, etc.

Pity the poor users.  The latency is awful from a user's perspective.
Yes, it already happens with images, but look what was required;  the
width and height attributes so a UA could display the HTML whilst it
waited for the image.  There's a big hit on many sites where another
retrieval is required for an external CSS file and there isn't the
`width/height' kludge around that.


Ralph.

Received on Saturday, 3 February 2001 06:32:52 UTC