- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:18:34 -0400
- To: "DAVID PEASLEE" <peasleed@lanecc.edu>, <www-html@w3.org>
- Cc: <david_peaslee2001@yahoo.com>
At 07:50 AM 10/26/00 -0700, DAVID PEASLEE wrote: >I author Lane Community College's Disability Services Internet page and >just redid my text only page using XHTML: >http://www.lanecc.edu/disability/textpage.htm >and reading through some information pages I found this TechRepublic page >http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220001019ggp01.htm >and would like to know if I am making the right choice, of if I moved to fast. >Please let me know if one of the choices stands out as the new >standard? And if that will chang the XHTML 1.0 I am using now. For regular Web browsing, XHTML is where it's at. The specs discussed in that article are all for business-to-business communications, not Web pages. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2000 13:15:12 UTC