- From: Gray Jonathan-AJG003C <Jonathan_Gray-AJG003C@email.mot.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:03:27 +0200
- To: "'Dave J Woolley'" <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>, "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
Please DJW take it easy. Set a proper subject if its [off topic] we dont all want to read it... -----Original Message----- From: Dave J Woolley [mailto:david.woolley@bts.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 2:25 PM To: 'www-html@w3.org' Subject: RE: form emails [OFF TOPIC] > From: Denis Boltikov [SMTP:subscribe@ensk.ru] > > test@test.com?to=my@email.net&subj=subj&body=your+text [DJW:] This response is not meaningful without specifying the specific product(s) that behave this way. It is a proprietory extension to URLs (not to HTML). It fails, from the address box, for IE 5.01 (to and subj ignored and + not substituted). It fails for NS 4.75 (subj ignored, + not substituted; I expected "to" to override the header To, but it adds a second destination). Fails for Lynx (same as NS 4.75, except that the default subject is the complete URL, rather than empty). Lynx probably behaves like NS because minority browsers are under pressure to behave like the superset of the big 2, in terms of support for proprietory features. I suspect subj is the wrong name. NB If this URL is used in an href attribute, the &'s must be replaced by &. Most browsers will recover from this error, but this list is about HTML as specified, not as abused. I prefixed the URL with "mailto:" for the tests.
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2000 09:03:40 UTC