Re: SM

Jukka Korpela:

> On Wed, 3 May 2000, Joe Kaczmarek wrote:

> > ™ may not be valid

> It is valid, but it is undefined. Anything may happen,
> and often will.

Indeed.

It seems no one has yet mentioned (here) one solution that is
correct and much better than abusing undefined character references:
Using the Windows character code "cp1252/windows-1252", correctly
labeling the page as such, and using _byte_ number 153 for the
trademark. This is perfectly OK, and will work almost everywhere.

#####################################################################
                         Bertilo Wennergren
                 <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
                     <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
#####################################################################

Received on Thursday, 4 May 2000 03:12:57 UTC