- From: James P. Salsman <bovik@best.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:03:07 -0800 (PST)
- To: Harald@Alvestrand.no
- Cc: ietf@ietf.org, www-forms@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
Harald, Thanks for your message: > There is no procedure to "suspend control of aspects" of a specification, The proposal would involve ammending the registration of the text/html media type, incorporating the W3C standards extended with two attributes of the INPUT element, DEVICE and MAXTIME. >... the IETF is of the opinion that HTML is not under our control anyway. I understand that. There might be substantial benefits from reconsidering those opinions. Within the IETF, public debate is assured on almost all controversial matters. The W3C, however, constrains meaningful debate to those willing and able to pay US$50,000 per year. I agree that there was a point in the early development of web standards when that constraint was beneficial. Now, however, with Netscape owned by a company shipping MSIE, and the stagnation or regression of the core HTML standards, along with the concerns raised in Norman Solomon's article, I believe the time has come to return certain aspects of the control of HTML to the IETF. Even if that view is not shared by the IETF, I the only way I would not be certain that a debate on the topic would be healthy for the Internet communty would be if the W3C were to take an affirmative stand on issues involving microphone upload for language instruction and asyncronous audio conferencing. Cheers, James
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2000 16:04:51 UTC