- From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 11:46:21 +0100
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
> From: pdf@bizfon.com [SMTP:pdf@bizfon.com] > > The alternative is to write <tr> and <td> elements with > block-level <script>s inside them, leaving empty rows > when scripting is unavailable. This does not appeal to > me aesthetically. :-) > [DJW:] The HTML spec says: HTML documents are constrained to conform to the HTML DTD both before and after processing any SCRIPT elements. I read that as saying that it is legal to generate </td></tr><tr><td>more row data</td></tr><tr><td> However, my experience of most web sites that generate HTML with Javascript is that I get a blank page when I access them (I disable it by default, for security reasons, and also out of principle), so speaking as a consumer, I would discourage dynamically created content in any form, although, as a coder, I have done it so that features that only worked with scripting disappear when viewed without scripting, the features themselves, being non-negotiable requirements.
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2000 06:53:38 UTC