- From: Arjun Ray <aray@q2.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 01:04:37 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-html@w3c.org
Here I try to sneak a message onto www-html by deliberately missspelling a 'significant' word, but no, not past the iron listbot! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:27:25 -0500 (EST) From: www-html-request@w3.org To: aray@q2.net Subject: Re: [META] How To Unsubsribe WARNING: Please try to use 'www-html-request@w3.org' the next time when issuing (un)subscribe requests. 32760 MArbudy@AIS.AIWA.com.sg MArbudy@AIS.AIWA.com.sg You have been removed from the list. If this wasn't your intention or you are having problems getting yourself unsubscribed, reply to this mail now (quoting it entirely (for diagnostic purposes), and of course adding any comments you see fit). Be sure to include some indication of what you want the list owners to do, since they are unlikely to be able to divine it from the message. Transcript of unsubscription request follows: -- >From www-html-request@tux.w3.org Wed Jan 26 00:27:23 2000 >Received: from tux.w3.org (tux.w3.org [18.29.0.27]) > [etc.] >Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:36:11 -0500 (EST) >From: Arjun Ray <aray@q2.net> >To: www-html@w3c.org >Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001260030480.15214-100000@mail.q2.net> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Subject: [META] How To Unsubsribe > > >This is the second time in one day I've received something like this: > >----- >Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 12:22:28 +0700 >From: "Arbudy, Makmur AIS" <MArbudy@AIS.AIWA.com.sg> >To: 'Arjun Ray' <aray@q2.net> >Subject: RE: XHTML Naming Rules - FPIs > >SOMEBODY PLEASE HELP, ME >HOW TO UNSUBCRIBE FROM WWW-HTML@W3.ORG !!!!!! >THANKYOU >----- > >I can't imagine how people got *on* to this list without having gone >through a procedure that told them how to get off the list. I also >don't understand why the 'Mailing Lists' link on the W3C Home page is >apparently so easy to miss or hard to find. > > http://www.w3.org/Mail/Lists.html > > http://www.w3.org/Mail/Request > >I'll bet no one reads this message either. -sigh- > > >Arjun > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2000 00:55:47 UTC