- From: Jan Roland Eriksson <jrexon@newsguy.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:40:02 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:17:10 -0800, Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> wrote: >Jan Roland Eriksson wrote: >> My question is; is it correct of the W3 server to redirect... >You ought not get me started on this one. Just as the W3C posts their >philosophical rant "Cool URIs don't change" they pull this number, which >runs completely counter to it. Very confusing for everyone, and in my >opinion just plain wrongheaded. There's been a bit of URI shuffling in several places at W3 lately, it created a bit of extra work for me at the css.nu site, and I'm just about to link check the entries I have in the CSS FAQ, I may have to fix something there too. >If TimBL is correct and names and addresses are the same thing, >then a URI should be the equivalent of a name. Obviously, they >are making the case against their own argument. It would have been nice if things stayed stable of course. Especially on a server that is vital to many. -- Jan Roland Eriksson <jrexon@newsguy.com> <URL:http://member.newsguy.com/%7Ejrexon/>
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2000 18:35:38 UTC