- From: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor <roconnor@uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:41:12 -0500 (EST)
- To: W3C HTML <www-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Murray Altheim wrote:
> Simple answer: there's not a conformant XML parser alive today that does
> anything other than use DOCTYPE to declare what document type definition
> a document conforms to,
Wait, isn't nsgmls a XML parse. Doesn't it use the DOCTYPE to declare
what document type *declaration* (ie grammer) the document conforms to?
It doesn't infer any document type definition information from this?
This would seem to be a contradiction to your claim. Not that current
incarations of XML parsers would be relevant anyways.
--
Russell O'Connor roconnor@uwaterloo.ca
<http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/~roconnor/>
``Paradoxically, a refusal to `put a monetary value on life' means that
life is often undervalued.'' -- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
Received on Monday, 17 January 2000 21:41:15 UTC