- From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 19:40:45 -0800
- To: www-html@w3.org
At 12:34p -0500 01/04/00, JOrendorff@ixl.com wrote: >From: walter@natural-innovations.com, 01/04/2000 10:35 AM > > At 09:00p -0600 01/03/00, Dan Connolly wrote: > > >It's too bad we didn't have them from the beginning, but we do have > > >them. They've been a W3C recommendation since Dec 1997. The current > > >spec is: > > > > > >17.9 Labels > > > > Gee, somehow I missed that. I wonder if any browsers make use > > of it yet... > >IE 5.0 does, and I try to use <label> wherever I can. It doesn't hurt >the rendering on old browsers at all; it's an ideal extension. >(Another ideal extension in html4 is <A title="">. Wonderful.) > >There is still the problem of making sure the label stays next to the >checkbox, though. <label> doesn't do this. That's what I really want to see, though. ::sigh:: >Since the dawn of time (well, 1994 anyway) tables have been used >to align form elements - and everything else, for that matter. >You can use a table to make sure the checkbox and its label appear >together. Except then the {checkbox+label} won't wrap, because tables don't wrap. I just want the checkbox to know what its label is, and hold on to it! It needs to know it so that you don't end up with the checkbox here [X] and its label here. It needs to be *bound* to it, which is why I thought of a label= attribute rather than an element. -Walter
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2000 22:42:13 UTC