www-html@w3.org from February 2000 by date

Wednesday, 1 March 2000

• Posting without subscribing Sue Sims
• Web Form Speech Input for all platforms Miguel Marcos

Tuesday, 29 February 2000

• Web Form Speech Input for Non-Wintel Systems Cesare Cioni
• html speech input jmfrenard@free.fr
• Resent-From headers (was Re: Device upload for all platforms) Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position James P. Salsman
• Re: file upload extension Walter Ian Kaye
• Non-proprietary web tags Ned Abell
• Petition: Web Form Speech Input for Non-Wintel Systems Morriz
• Re: file upload extension Jukka.Korpela@hut.fi
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Dave Raggett
• Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position Steven Pemberton
• Re: file upload extension Steven Pemberton
• The role of the style attribute: HTML WG official position Steven Pemberton
• Re: file upload extension Clover Andrew
• Re: file upload extension Jukka.Korpela@hut.fi
• Builder.com discussion on the style attribute Jonny Axelsson
• file upload extension Walter Ian Kaye
• White Space Scott Violet
• Sun's position on device upload James P. Salsman

Monday, 28 February 2000

• Petition: Web Form Speech Input for Non-Wintel Systems Lucas Vogel
• Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position Murray Altheim
• Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position George Hobbs
• RE: Device upload for all platforms JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Mac user input Jim Culberson
• Re: Device upload for all platforms Murray Altheim
• In support of non proprietary device upload standards. Alessandro Forghieri
• Device Upload Proposal Bluett, Mike
• Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position James P. Salsman
• Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position Steven Pemberton
• Re: inline CSS - Argument for David Carlisle

Saturday, 26 February 2000

• Endorse the device upload protocol please bruno.boutteau

Monday, 28 February 2000

• please endorse upload for all platforms. not just wintel Suzie Blount
• Re: Device upload for all platforms Jacob Palme
• Petition: Web Form Speech Input for Non-Wintel Systems Maria Aretoulaki
• Re: text input form resize Andy Waite
• Re: Device upload for all platforms Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: text input form resize Yude.Hu

Sunday, 27 February 2000

• Device upload for all platforms George Hobbs
• Re: Device upload for all platforms Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
• Device upload for all platforms Jacob Palme

Saturday, 26 February 2000

• Re: inline CSS - Argument for Daniel Hiester
• Re: suggestions... Terje Bless
• Re: suggestions... Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: suggestions... Andy Waite
• Re: W3C Chat before XTech 2000: XHTML - a bridge to the Web of the future Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: W3C Chat before XTech 2000: XHTML - a bridge to the Web of the future Susan Lesch

Friday, 25 February 2000

• RE: suggestions... JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: suggestions... Nir Dagan
• suggestions... by way of Alan Kotok

Thursday, 24 February 2000

• Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Murray Altheim
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Braden N. McDaniel
• SP's spam Was: (Seperating ...) Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• RE: Separating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) David Wagner
• Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray
• Re: inline CSS - Argument for Albert Lunde
• Re: inline CSS - Argument for David Carlisle
• Re: inline CSS - Argument for fantasai
• Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Arjun Ray
• Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Arjun Ray
• Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray
• Re: pre-XHTML discussions: sprinkles/islands [was: ...] Arjun Ray
• Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Tantek Çelik
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• RE: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray
• Re: inline CSS - score so far Arjun Ray
• RE: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Chris Wilson
• Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Arjun Ray
• Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray

Wednesday, 23 February 2000

• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jonny Axelsson
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sal Candido
• RE: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) David Wagner
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: inline CSS - score so far Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Frank Boumphrey
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim
• Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Murray Altheim
• RE: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CS S - score so far) Patrice Calve
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Braden N. McDaniel
• Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) David Wagner
• pre-XHTML discussions: sprinkles/islands [was: ...] Dan Connolly
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Nir Dagan
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Dave J Woolley
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim
• RE: inline CSS - score so far Piers Williams
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson
• Re: inline CSS - score so far Murray Altheim
• Re: Deprecated or not? Murray Altheim
• RE: inline CSS - score so far David Wagner
• RE: inline CSS - score so far Dave J Woolley
• inline CSS - score so far JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: Deprecated or not? Bertilo Wennergren
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Walter Ian Kaye
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Dorothée Caulier
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jonny Axelsson
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jonny Axelsson
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Arjun Ray
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jeffrey
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Arjun Ray
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) L. David Baron
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Susan Lesch
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sal Candido
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sue Sims
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Frank Boumphrey
• Re: Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Matthew Brealey
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Daniel Hiester
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sal Candido
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson
• Re: Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Nir Dagan

Tuesday, 22 February 2000

• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim
• Re: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Murray Altheim
• Re:XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Nir Dagan
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson
• Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Matthew Brealey
• Re:XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Matthew Brealey
• RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson
• RE: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Jonathan Rosenne
• RE: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: CODE, VAR, KBD and SAMP JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim
• Re: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Murray Altheim
• Re: Deprecated or not? Murray Altheim
• Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim
• Re: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Nir Dagan
• Re: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: STRONG; I, B, (TT) Alan G. Isaac
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Dave J Woolley
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Roy.Gardiner@natwest.com
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Piers Williams
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Patrice Calve
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Jonny Axelsson
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Piers Williams
• XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: STRONG; I, B, (TT) Jonny Axelsson
• XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Jonny Axelsson
• XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: CODE, VAR, KBD and SAMP Jonny Axelsson
• XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: Introduction Jonny Axelsson
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Patrice Calve
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray
• RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Dave J Woolley
• Re: Deprecated or not? Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: URL better than FPI Murray Altheim
• Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle
• Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle
• [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• RE: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim

Monday, 21 February 2000

• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Håkon Wium Lie
• [www-html] <none> Prince Nokman
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) JOrendorff@ixl.com
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jonny Axelsson
• RE: URL better than FPI Dave J Woolley
• Re: Deprecated or not? Murray Altheim
• Re: URL better than FPI Murray Altheim
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson
• Deprecated or not? Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle
• RE: URL better than FPI Dave J Woolley
• Re: URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle
• Re: URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: URL better than FPI Murray Altheim
• Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim
• W3C Chat before XTech 2000: XHTML - a bridge to the Web of the future Dan Connolly
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Tantek Çelik
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: passing values through <a href> links Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: passing values through <a href> links Sal Candido

Sunday, 20 February 2000

• Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray
• Re: passing values through <a href> links Jeffrey

Monday, 14 February 2000

• passing values through <a href> links Sam Rose

Sunday, 20 February 2000

• Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray

Saturday, 19 February 2000

• Chat Topic: LDO - an XML transport library Ken MacLeod
• Re: HTML vs socio-political correctness Tim Greenhoot

Friday, 18 February 2000

• Re: HTML vs socio-political correctness Murray Altheim

Saturday, 19 February 2000

• Re: URL better than FPI Dan Connolly
• Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Arjun Ray
• Re: HTML vs socio-political correctness Daniel Hiester
• Re: HTML vs socio-political correctness Arjun Ray
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Daniel Hiester
• HTML vs socio-political correctness John Pierce
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray

Friday, 18 February 2000

• Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly
• Discussion (www-html) vs. requests (www-html-editor) Dan Connolly
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? John Whelan
• Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray
• URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly
• RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Dave J Woolley
• RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Dave J Woolley
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Murray Altheim
• CSS3 Jacob Lindborg
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Daniel Hiester
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Daniel Hiester
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Maury Markowitz
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray
• Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson
• inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss

Thursday, 17 February 2000

• Re: HTTP headers Michael Hamm
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Murray Altheim
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Karl Dubost
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Murray Altheim
• RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? John W Pierce
• Unoticed Error in XHTML 1.0? Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Sue Sims
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Murray Altheim
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly
• RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Jelks Cabaniss
• Re: review process [was: identify...] Murray Altheim
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Jonny Axelsson
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Frank Boumphrey
• Re: HTTP headers Dan Connolly
• RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Dave J Woolley
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Simon St.Laurent
• [www-html] <none> David Carlisle
• HTTP headers Michael Hamm
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Tantek Çelik
• RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? David Wagner
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Daniel Hiester
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• SV: is anyone interested in XHTML? Jacob Lindborg
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Maury Markowitz
• SV: Ok, here's my suggestion... Jacob Lindborg
• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Dan Connolly
• review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly
• RE: Ok, here's my suggestion... Dave J Woolley
• RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Piers Williams

Saturday, 12 February 2000

• Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Murray Altheim

Wednesday, 16 February 2000

• question/suggestion on input element Nick Traenkner

Thursday, 17 February 2000

• is anyone interested in XHTML? Simon St.Laurent
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly
• Re: Ok, here's my suggestion... Daniel Hiester
• question about forms Adrian Walters
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: Ok, here's my suggestion... Matthew Slocombe
• Ok, here's my suggestion... Maury Markowitz

Wednesday, 16 February 2000

• off-topic regarding off-topics mauricio portasio
• Re: Suggestions for HTML go where? Nir Dagan
• Suggestions for HTML go where? Maury Markowitz

Tuesday, 15 February 2000

• Re: Scrolling tables without frames Nick Traenkner

Wednesday, 16 February 2000

• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Frank Boumphrey

Saturday, 12 February 2000

• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Murray Altheim

Wednesday, 16 February 2000

• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI (W3C's motives) Arjun Ray
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI (W3C's motives) Dan Connolly
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Terje Bless
• Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Jan Roland Eriksson

Tuesday, 15 February 2000

• Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Arjun Ray
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly
• Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Nir Dagan
• Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Francis X. Speiser Jr.
• Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Arjun Ray
• Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Francis X. Speiser Jr.
• Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Nir Dagan
• RE: Dropdown Menu Trouble Grant, John
• Dropdown Menu Trouble John Bergsing
• RE: Scrolling tables without frames Dave J Woolley
• RE: Scrolling tables without frames Grant, John
• Scrolling tables without frames Brendan Devers
• Re: FPI case sensitivity in draft-connolly-text-html-02 Arjun Ray

Monday, 14 February 2000

• FPI case sensitivity in draft-connolly-text-html-02 Gerald Oskoboiny
• RE: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray
• Re: alt element (was: naming custom/extended tags) Arjun Ray
• Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Jonny Axelsson
• RE: alt element (was: naming custom/extended tags) David Wagner
• Re: NAME attribute for IMG Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: alt element (was: naming custom/extended tags) Dave J Woolley
• Re: NAME attribute for IMG Dmitry Beransky
• NAME attribute for IMG pdf@bizfon.com
• alt element (was: naming custom/extended tags) JOrendorff@ixl.com
• RE: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general rev-bob@gotc.com
• Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray
• XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization, prologue Jonny Axelsson
• Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray
• Open File not in HTML format Syahruddin Podding
• New here... Waseem Anis
• Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Jonny Axelsson
• Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray

Sunday, 13 February 2000

• Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Jonny Axelsson
• RE: naming custom/extended tags Arjun Ray
• French version de ATAG 1.0 Karl Dubost
• A MUSIC SITE ..... ravikiran@iiit.net

Saturday, 12 February 2000

• RE: naming custom/extended tags JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Advice and Advocacy (was: naming custom/extended tags) Arjun Ray
• Re: naming custom/extended tags Dan Connolly
• RE: naming custom/extended tags Arjun Ray

Friday, 11 February 2000

• RE: Lists in tables David Wagner
• RE: naming custom/extended tags JOrendorff@ixl.com
• naming custom/extended tags Michael Blow
• Re: "validate against"??? Dan Connolly
• Lists in tables pdf@bizfon.com
• Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray
• Re: "validate against"??? Arjun Ray

Thursday, 10 February 2000

• identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly
• "validate against"??? Dan Connolly
• RE: input type="image" with no borders Dave J Woolley
• RE: input type="image" with no borders Hugo Koji Kobayashi
• RE: input type="image" with no borders Dave J Woolley
• input type="image" with no borders Hugo Koji Kobayashi
• Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray

Wednesday, 9 February 2000

• Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Nir Dagan
• RE: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Dave J Woolley
• Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Jonny Axelsson

Tuesday, 8 February 2000

• RE: javascript scheme in href URLs JOrendorff@ixl.com
• Re: input tag height Peter Rippe
• input tag height Grant, John
• RE: javascript scheme in href URLs Dave J Woolley
• javascript scheme in href URLs Simon St.Laurent

Monday, 7 February 2000

• Some important questions about document profiles and their use Nabil Layaida

Sunday, 6 February 2000

• Notations in (x)HTML Arjun Ray
• Re: Notations are useful Arjun Ray

Saturday, 5 February 2000

• Re: Notations are useful Murray Altheim

Friday, 4 February 2000

• RE: web page David Wagner
• Re: web page Suzanne Topping

Thursday, 3 February 2000

• unused parameter entity Simon St.Laurent

Friday, 4 February 2000

• RE: Netscape and IE images Dave J Woolley
• RE: Netscape and IE images Dave J Woolley
• Notations are useful Arjun Ray
• Re: web page Frank Boumphrey
• web page M.H.M Hibatullah
• Re: Netscape and IE images Will Wilson
• Re: Netscape and IE images Daniel Hiester

Thursday, 3 February 2000

• RE: Netscape and IE images rev-bob@gotc.com
• (A) exclusion Jonny Axelsson
• Re: Netscape and IE images Benjamin Randall

Wednesday, 2 February 2000

• missing references Simon St.Laurent
• RE: RSAC stupidity? Dave J Woolley
• RSAC stupidity? rev-bob@gotc.com
• Re: Table height Daniel Hiester
• RE: Table height Dave J Woolley
• RE: RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) Dave J Woolley
• RE: RSAC stupidity rev-bob@gotc.com
• RE: RSAC stupidity Walter Ian Kaye

Tuesday, 1 February 2000

• Re: Comm 4.7 and XHTML (was Re: RSAC stupidity) Murray Altheim
• Comm 4.7 and XHTML (was Re: RSAC stupidity) Karl Dubost
• Re: XHTML/XML comment Murray Altheim
• RE: XHTML/XML comment Christopher Luebcke
• Re: XHTML/XML comment Murray Altheim
• Re: XHTML/XML comment (case sensitivity an I18N, redux) Arjun Ray
• Re: RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) Murray Altheim
• RE: RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) rev-bob@gotc.com
• Re: RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) wgzhu@quoininc.com
• Re: RSAC stupidity Walter Ian Kaye
• RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: XHTML/XML comment (case sensitivity an I18N, redux) Dan Oscarsson
• HTML, XML and "Idioms" Arjun Ray

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 February 2000 22:26:52 UTC