- From: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:58:01 -0000
- To: "'ADNAN BARADI'" <adnanbaradi@joinnet.com.jo>
- Cc: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
> From: ADNAN BARADI [SMTP:adnanbaradi@joinnet.com.jo] > > PLEASE, WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW, WHO OWNS THE (HTML) AT PRESENT !! IS IT [DJW:] The copyright on the specification is owned by the World Wide Web Consortium. Full details are in the specification, which you should have downloaded and read before even thinking of asking this question. > STILL RELATED TO THE FOUNDERS AT SWITZERLAND, WHAT EVER THE ANSWER > TO THIS, IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE THEIR FULL ADDRESS, BESIDE THEIR E-MAIL > ADDRESS, DO THEY HAVE A WEB > SITE? > [DJW:] The web site is the obvious one that you can deduce from the address of this mailing list: <http://www.w3.org/> > WHAT ABOUT MICROSOFT AND NETS SCAPE, DO THEY OWN A COPYWRITE TO THE > HTML, IF THEY ARE INVOLVED WITH THE OWNER SHIP, WHAT IS BRIEFLY THE [DJW:] They are members of the consortium. > COLOR CODING, WHICH IS BASED UPON THE HTML COLOR CODES, BUT WITH A [DJW:] HTML colour codes are deprecated, and not in the strict versions of the language, as you would have discovered by reading the specification. Any proposal to add presentational features, like this, is almost certainly going to get rejected. (Deprecated means that they may be used to support old browser, but should be phased out of new pages as soon as practicable.) Such features are handled using style sheets. I have a suspicion that CSS3 already includes sophisticated colour models, like ICC. For more heavily graphical material, SVG would be the medium of choice. I don't think you will get much support for adding support for proprietory features to browsers, especially given that Netscape 6 is based on open source code, so they will lose most of their developers for any feature that requires a licence fee. [IANAL] -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS. >
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2000 07:58:16 UTC