- From: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 19:30:06 -0000
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
> From: Christian Smith [SMTP:csmith@barebones.com] > > I this valid? > > <img src="foo.gif" alt="<![CDATA[ Jack & Jill ]]>" /> > [DJW:] No. Naked &'s and <'s are not permitted in attribute values, and XML directives are definitely not recognized in that context. See <http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#sec-common-syn>, production number [10]. Whilst it is just conceivable that some version of XHTML has extended ALT to allow it to include XML text for recursive expansion, such a change would not be understood by a general validator, because it requires knowledge beyond the content of the DTD, and would not be backwards compatible, because of the need to double escape < when one doesn't want interpreted as the start of a tag. The comment that someone made about the validator is probably referring to the fact that it fails to fault the use of < in the value; a rule that is probably in there to allow rapid error recovery. As far as I know, an SGML parser (e.g. one for HTML) should not recover from an unclosed quote on seeing a new tag. The validator is based on an SGML validator, and may well not account for this subtlety. -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 14:30:12 UTC