- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil.kjernsmo@astro.uio.no>
- Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 22:43:59 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@operasoftware.com>
- cc: JOrendorff@ixl.com, www-html@w3.org
On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Håkon Wium Lie wrote: >Perhaps someone should start collecting a list of "standard" class >names? While I don't know if introducing new elements for e.g. names are a good idea, I'm a bit skeptical about "standard" class names. Wouldn't we just end up with the same kind of mess that we have with meta-names and content of LINK rel and rev? I mean, "description" and "keywords" are pretty standard meta names, and of course <LINK rel=next ...>, you've got Dublin Core and so on, and a pretty nice list of things in use are at <URL:http://vancouver-webpages.com/META/> but we needed RDF to clear up in these issues... If you really need something that must be standard, then you need a formal specification that is clear, it seems to me. Best, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Graduate astronomy-student Problems worthy of attack University of Oslo, Norway Prove their worth by hitting back E-mail: kjetikj@astro.uio.no - Piet Hein Homepage <URL:http://www.astro.uio.no/~kjetikj/> Webmaster@skepsis.no
Received on Sunday, 24 October 1999 16:44:17 UTC