- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 12:46:37 -0400 (EDT)
- To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Continuing the explorations I was making last night, this time for a 'ways to abuse comments' section, I was working on a piece about the common use in HTML of comments around the contents of SCRIPT elements. (It hides the content from browsers that don't support scripts, basically.) Here's an example HTML document that uses this convention: <HTML> <HEAD><TITLE>Generating Content - Or Not</TITLE></HEAD> <BODY> <SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript"><!-- document.writeln("<H1>Generated Content</H1>"); var todaysDate=new Date(); var message="<P>Welcome to " + (todaysDate.getMonth()+1) + "/" + todaysDate.getDate() + "/" + todaysDate.getYear() + "!</P>" document.writeln(message); //--> </SCRIPT> <!-- // is used to hide the HTML comment closing from JavaScript--> </BODY> </HTML> HTML 4.01 supports this convention - see http://www.w3.org/TR/html40/interact/scripts.html#h-18.3.2 XHTML 1.0 has nothing to say about this convention, even in its 'Script and Style Elements' section (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.8) where it discusses the use of CDATA sections to escape potentially difficult code. Comments appear not to be described at all, though they are used in examples. I'd guess the convention has come to the end of the line, but it's not really clear. Thoughts? Is the final final review period (after members have voted) over yet? Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com
Received on Friday, 15 October 1999 12:50:50 UTC