- From: Frank Boumphrey <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
 - Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 11:37:24 -0400
 - To: "Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor" <roconnor@uwaterloo.ca>, <75819671@it.ibm.com>
 - Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
 
> The difficultly of making an SGML parser is probably overblown. having written parsers for both i can assure you that it is not!! Writing a non-validating XML parser is quite simple. Also if you want a validating parser there is a whole series of XML parsers that can be had for the asking. Incorporating them in your soft ware takes no more than a few lines of code. frank ----- Original Message ----- From: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor <roconnor@uwaterloo.ca> To: <75819671@it.ibm.com> Cc: <www-html@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 10:04 AM Subject: Re: Doctypes, Declarations, and HTML Versions > On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 75819671@it.ibm.com wrote: > > > The point is that XML is designed to be easily parsed by browsers, SGML does > > not. > > The difficultly of making an SGML parser is probably overblown. > > -- > Russell O'Connor roconnor@uwaterloo.ca > <http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/~roconnor/> > ``And truth irreversibly destroys the meaning of its own message'' > -- Anindita Dutta, ``The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy'' >
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 1999 11:30:50 UTC