- From: Rob Spindler <Rob.Spindler@ASU.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 20:41:33 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Greetings! I'm a professonal archivist who is trying to develop recommendations I can provide to page developers at our university and elsewhere to improve long term viability of their documents. I have until recently been suggesting to developers that W3c validation process was a way of conforming their work to some sort of standard that might improve the prospects for interoperability and sustainability. I was intrigued by the three flavors options presented in html 4.0 thinking that perhaps one of the flavors might be a special set of tags labelled "archival". It would seem that the most robust of the options would be "Strict", but that doesn't accomodate graphic elements that could be an integral part of the "record" that must be preserved. (yes we have html applications on our campus for multimedia-born documents that are legally public records) Has W3C considered this and do they make a recommendation for the flavor appropriate for archival retention?
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 1999 05:33:51 UTC