- From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:27:57 -0800
- To: www-html@w3.org
From: Braden N. McDaniel Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:32 -0500 Subject: Re: XHTML >If you don't see the value of a version of HTML expressed in XML rather than >SGML, then simply *don't use it*. I don't see the rationale beind all this >harping against the notion of the very existence of such a thing. If it's >*really* the bad idea some of you think it is, it will fail on its own. There is also the matter of whether XHTML will be accessible by every platform which can currently access HTML. The *last* thing we should ever do is widen what Jesse Jackson called the "digital divide". The NUMBER ONE priority should be extending access to third-world countries, ghetto neighborhoods, the homeless, the infirmed, and everyone else on the planet. The World-Wide Web is supposed to bring us together; it must NEVER do the opposite. If XML is to be the new language, then developers MUST write XML browsers to run on EVERY platform which currently has an HTML browser (and they'll run in a smaller footprint, right?). This means DOS 3.3, Win3.1, MacOS 6.0, AmigaOS, PalmOS, NewtonOS, NextStep, etc. If it can dial into the 'Net, it will need an XML browser. If you have a high-paying job, you can afford to buy a new machine. If you're unemployed, homeless, or live in some poor remote village, you can't -- you have to make do with old hand-me-downs, which might be an old PC-XT. These people need FULL access to information, and we MUST help them become and stay connected to EVERYTHING that we can access. To do any less is unconscionable. -Walter a member of the human race, who knows what it's like to be homeless
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 1999 19:27:41 UTC