- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 09:54:16 -0500
- To: George Lund <george@lundboox.demon.co.uk>, www-html@w3.org
At 10:20 PM 3/1/99 +0000, George Lund wrote: >With 'XHTML' (so-called), huge numbers of valid HTML 4 documents are no >longer valid, even though 'XHTML' is supposed to be the same as HTML 4. No, it's not supposed to be the same. It is a reformulation of HTML 4.0 in XML. That there may be minor constraints placed on it getting into the "in XML" part shouldn't be unexpected. Ann --- Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials Buy it online! http://www.webgeek.com/about.html Owner, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 1999 09:57:38 UTC