- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 08:57:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: GignacDA@nswccd.navy.mil, www-html@w3.org
On Fri, 28 May 1999 10:25:05 -0400 (EDT), GignacDA@nswccd.navy.mil wrote: > > Accordingly, these entities must be redefined as > > <!ENTITY amp "&&" > <!-- ampersand, U+0026 ISOnum --> > > <!ENTITY lt "&<"> <!-- less-than sign, U+003C ISOnum --> I think it [1] should say <!ENTITY amp "&#38;" > <!-- ampersand, U+0026 ISOnum --> <!ENTITY lt "&#60;"> <!-- less-than sign, U+003C ISOnum --> as noted in section 4.6 of the XML recommendation [2]. The difference is the removal of the second ampersand, since the replacement text should be & and <, not && and &<. However, I agree that it's currently wrong. David [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/HTMLspecialx.ent [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-predefined-ent L. David Baron Freshman, Harvard dbaron@fas.harvard.edu Links, SatPix, CSS, etc. < http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~dbaron/ > WSP CSS AC < http://www.webstandards.org/css/ >
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 1999 08:57:13 UTC