- From: George Lund <george@lundboox.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 16:36:18 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
In article <Pine.WNT.4.10.9907101745060.-931579@uymfdlvk>, Nir Dagan <nir@nirdagan.com> writes >An XML browser that does not understand SGML and doesn't have a DTD of >HTML at hand can still render an xhtml document well if it is served >as XML and with a stylesheet. It will be unable to display SGMLish HTML. > >Thus, reformulation HTML in XML makes it very cheap for XML applications >to render HTML. The whole point about HTML is that it shouldn't need a style sheet because there is a common set of elements which can be understood by a variety of UAs. If a style sheet is *required* to in order for the UA to display the file (rather than provide its own style sheet) the beauty of HTML is lost. Any (CSS) style sheets provided by an author can only ever be an optional extra. So UAs which want to handle HTML (or XHTML) will obviously have to be provided with at least the equivalent of a basic style sheet. And once that has been done, the added cost of providing the 34.1KB DTD is negligible. -- George Lund
Received on Saturday, 10 July 1999 11:39:13 UTC